TESTING THE PROPOSITION:

"... any publicly made (non-frivolous) allegation of

serious misconduct ... against a Supreme Court Justice

would receive intense scrutiny in the press..."

    — 1993 Report of the National Commission on Judicial Discipline & Removal (at p. 122)


 

TEST #1:  CJA’s NOVEMBER 6, 1998 IMPEACHMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST AND THE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES
             — and the House Judiciary Committee’s Cover-Up of the Hundreds of Judicial Impeachment Complaints It Receives    

     

 

TEST #2:    2004 SUPPLEMENT.
Supreme Court's impeachable repudiation of Congressionally-imposed obligations of disqualification & disclosure under 28 USC 455 & disregard for the single recommendation addressed to it by the 1993 Report of the National Commission on Judicial Discipline & Removal that it consider establishing an internal mechanism to review judicial misconduct complaints against its justices.



TEST #3:    2007 "Disruption of Congress" Case -- "How Does the U.S. Supreme Court Handles Misconduct Complaints against its Staff?"

CJA Homepage  •  Latest News  •  Join Us  •  Site Search

Corporate Office, Westchester, NY 283 Soundview Ave, White Plains, New York 10606 Tel: (914) 421-1200 • Fax: (914) 684-6554 e-mail: mail@judgewatch.org

Long Island, NY Office Post Office Box 3002, Southampton, New York 11969 Tel: (631) 377-3583 • Fax: (631) 377-3582 e-mail: cja@judgewatch.org