|
NYS JUDICIAL COMPENSATION
BRANSTEN v. STATE OF NEW YORK
Bransten
v. State of New York
(S.Ct/NY Co.
#159160-2012)
record
May 21, 2013 Supreme Court decision -- Carol Robinson Edmead &
here
"It is beyond cavil that "compensation" in the context of one's
employment constitutes more than mere wages. Indeed, the general
consensus among the courts is that compensation includes wages and
benefits,
including health insurance benefits (see
Roe v Board of Trustees of Vil. of Bellport,
65 AD3d 1211,
1211, 1212 [2d Dept 2009]..."
Appellate Division, First Dept's May 6, 2014 decision &
here
Edmead's March 25, 2015 decision &
here
Court of Appeals Docket
Attorney General's Brief -- November 23,
2015
Record-Volume 1
Record-Volume 2
March 29, 2016 Respondents' Brief
April 27, 2016 Attorney General's Reply Brief
October 14, 2017: "Law
Beat: Judges, their health care cost. It's awkward."
Albany Times Union
Transcript -- Oral Argument: Court of Apppeals
Court of Appeals' November 21, 2017 decision
30 NY3d 434
"The State appealed to this Court as of right directly from Supreme
Court's judgment pursuant to CPLR 5601 (b) (2).[FN3]"
*
* *
"N.Y. judges' lawsuit over
health benefit cuts can move forward: judge", May 22, 2013,
Thomson Reuters, Joseph Ax
"Judges
Denied Back Pay after winning suit for higher wages",
New York Post (Julia Marsh), July 10, 2014
*
* *
click here for:
MENU OF CJA's JUDICIAL COMPENSATION
WEBPAGES
|
