CUOMO v. COELIG  at the Court of Appeals  
APL-2024-00076

NYSCEF DOCKET: Supreme Court-Albany 
 
NYSCEF DOCKET:  Appellate Division/Third Dept

    VIDEO: Feb 16, 2024 oral argument at AD3

1.
COELIG's August 14, 2024 brief

COELIG's August 16, 2024 request for calendar preference

Amici "Good Gov't"/NYC Bar Association August 23, 2024 brief

Would-Be Amici's Aug 23, 2024 motion for leave for file amicus curiae brief in support of COELIG
 
Court's Sept 12, 2024 order

Cuomo's October 30, 2024 brief

COELIG's November 15, 2024 reply brief

2.
CJA's December 16, 2024 motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief to prevent fraud & for enforcement of Court Rule 500.1

CJA's December 16, 2024 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF

Exhibit 1:   
CJA’s January 12, 2024 notice of motion,
moving affidavit, and its four exhibits in Cuomo v. COELIG 

Exhibit 2:   
CJA’s January 22, 2024 reply affirmation in further support of the motion,
and its three exhibits 

Exhibit 3:   
CJA’s November 13, 2024 testimony/complaint
“against COELIG’s Commissioners, Executive Director, General Counsel,
& Other High-Ranking Staff”, with March 29, 2023 testimony 

Exhibit 4:   
CJA’s November 15, 2024 supplement to testimony and complaint
by its four FOIL requests

Exhibit 5:
CJA’s August 6, 2024 letter to the seven new law school deans of the “independent review committee”, cc’ing their predecessor law school deans and the IRC’s other eight law school deans

3.
Motion Clerk MacVean's December 26, 2024 letter 

4.
CJA's Statement Pursuant to Court Rule 500.23(a)(4)(iii)

uploaded motion

5.
ASG Brockner's December 30, 2024 letter to Clerk Davis

6.
CJA's January 3, 2025 letter to Clerk Davis

Chief Motion Clerk MacVean's January 3, 2025 letter

7.
VIDEO of January 7, 2025 Oral Argument


Cannataro Recusal Form   December 16, 2024 Order

8.
January 9, 2025 Order
"ORDERED, that the motion, insofar as it seeks leave to file a brief amicus curiae
on the appeal herein, is denied (see Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] §500.23 ['Amicus curiae relief will be denied where acceptance of the amicus curiae submission may cause the recusal or disqualification
of one or more Judges of the Court']); and it is further
ORDERED, that the motion is otherwise denied.
Chief Judge Wilson and Judge Cannataro took no part" 
(on motion list)

-------------

CJA's January 8, 2025 FOIL request --
"Whether any cases involving JCOPE were ever appealed to the Court of Appeals"

CJA's January 15, 2025 e-mail -- "Correcting..."

COELIG's January 15, 2025 acknowledgment

-----------

At the Court of Appeals 
CJA v. JCOPE, et al.